<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving danger? So what if Obama is reconsidering moving 9/11 trials</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.911familiesforamerica.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.911familiesforamerica.org/?p=3061</link>
	<description>The war against sharia is a struggle to preserve our Republic, our religion, and our civilization, and to set free a suffering humanity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:59:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Reeg</title>
		<link>http://www.911familiesforamerica.org/?p=3061&#038;cpage=1#comment-16182</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Reeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911familiesforamerica.org/?p=3061#comment-16182</guid>
		<description>For all the reasons that have been discussed here, ad nauseam, I am vehemently opposed to any prosecution of KSM and the rest, other than in a military tribunal at GTMO. However, I am outraged by these New Yawkers who are now demanding a change of venue. Did it suddenly dawn of them that it might not be such a good idea to prosecute these blood thirsty maniacs in an Article III trial in Manhattan? Really, you don&#039;t say? It takes some nerve to even think of dumping the expense, inconvenience and danger on another city. How dare them? Let&#039;s not forget that this is what the President promised and this is what New Yawkers voted for.
On another matter, Attorney General Erik Holder has been under some stiff criticism for is handling of the trial. Let me make this perfectly clear, Mr. Holder is only a stooge for the President. This entire business of moving the trials from the OMC jurisdiction to the DOJ has been orchestrated by President Obama. KSM and the other detainees are currently being held in a military instillation. The Attorney General doesn&#039;t have to authority to order the Secretary of Defense to hand over KSM to the Justice Department; the order had to come from President Obama. Mr. Holder is merely an empty-headed puppet sitting on President Obama&#039;s lap. Perhaps we should refer to him as Attorney General Jerry Mahoney?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all the reasons that have been discussed here, ad nauseam, I am vehemently opposed to any prosecution of KSM and the rest, other than in a military tribunal at GTMO. However, I am outraged by these New Yawkers who are now demanding a change of venue. Did it suddenly dawn of them that it might not be such a good idea to prosecute these blood thirsty maniacs in an Article III trial in Manhattan? Really, you don&#8217;t say? It takes some nerve to even think of dumping the expense, inconvenience and danger on another city. How dare them? Let&#8217;s not forget that this is what the President promised and this is what New Yawkers voted for.<br />
On another matter, Attorney General Erik Holder has been under some stiff criticism for is handling of the trial. Let me make this perfectly clear, Mr. Holder is only a stooge for the President. This entire business of moving the trials from the OMC jurisdiction to the DOJ has been orchestrated by President Obama. KSM and the other detainees are currently being held in a military instillation. The Attorney General doesn&#8217;t have to authority to order the Secretary of Defense to hand over KSM to the Justice Department; the order had to come from President Obama. Mr. Holder is merely an empty-headed puppet sitting on President Obama&#8217;s lap. Perhaps we should refer to him as Attorney General Jerry Mahoney?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Sadik</title>
		<link>http://www.911familiesforamerica.org/?p=3061&#038;cpage=1#comment-16181</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Sadik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911familiesforamerica.org/?p=3061#comment-16181</guid>
		<description>Suddenly the populus is beginning to realize a big reason why detainees are kept in Guantanamo -- physical security -- rather just some wonderfully-evil-conspiracy-theory related to torture and oversight avoidance.

If Guantanamo is able to handle military commissions and Habeas Corpus federal hearings there&#039;s no reason it can&#039;t handle federal criminal trials. Secure teleconference abilities for classified information, video feeds, media viewing rooms, detention facilities for the detainees during hearings. They money has already been spent building and maintaining these facilities and the facilities are secure (if spartan for the journalists covering the trial) but, as usual, the government wants to spend more money on redundant facilities.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Editor --&lt;/em&gt; 

Your point is a good one; a federal 9/11 trial could be securely conducted at Gitmo. Yet they would still take 2 to 4 years to prepare and conduct.  

Why wait? Obama and Holder have both stated that the changes made in 2009 to the Military Commissions Act of 2006 fixed them to become on par in fairness to federal trials. Not only did Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his four cohorts attempt to plead guilty in November 2008, their full trial was ready to begin in January 2009. In fact, it was reported last July that military commissions &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/21/gitmo-review-delayed-6-months/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;were ready to proceed at Gitmo&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; against 66 detainees. 

Instead, President Obama is &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henny_Youngman&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;doing a takeoff&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; of Henny Youngman, &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/30/AR2010013001331_pf.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Take my 9/11 trial, please&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, for $200 million,&quot; along with all the dangers and disruptions to peoples&#039; lives in your community for the 2 to 4 years it we&#039;ll take to conduct them. What a deal!

It costs $100 million annually to run the detention facility at Guantanamo, it is highly secure, ready to conduct military commissions for KSM et al, their defense lawyers are ready to defend them, and we&#039;d protect national security by conducting them in that manner.

Here&#039;s a wild idea: Let&#039;s try them at Gitmo by military commission this year.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suddenly the populus is beginning to realize a big reason why detainees are kept in Guantanamo &#8212; physical security &#8212; rather just some wonderfully-evil-conspiracy-theory related to torture and oversight avoidance.</p>
<p>If Guantanamo is able to handle military commissions and Habeas Corpus federal hearings there&#8217;s no reason it can&#8217;t handle federal criminal trials. Secure teleconference abilities for classified information, video feeds, media viewing rooms, detention facilities for the detainees during hearings. They money has already been spent building and maintaining these facilities and the facilities are secure (if spartan for the journalists covering the trial) but, as usual, the government wants to spend more money on redundant facilities.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Editor &#8211;</em> </p>
<p>Your point is a good one; a federal 9/11 trial could be securely conducted at Gitmo. Yet they would still take 2 to 4 years to prepare and conduct.  </p>
<p>Why wait? Obama and Holder have both stated that the changes made in 2009 to the Military Commissions Act of 2006 fixed them to become on par in fairness to federal trials. Not only did Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his four cohorts attempt to plead guilty in November 2008, their full trial was ready to begin in January 2009. In fact, it was reported last July that military commissions <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/21/gitmo-review-delayed-6-months/" rel="nofollow"><strong>were ready to proceed at Gitmo</strong></a> against 66 detainees. </p>
<p>Instead, President Obama is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henny_Youngman" rel="nofollow"><strong>doing a takeoff</strong></a> of Henny Youngman, &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/30/AR2010013001331_pf.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>Take my 9/11 trial, please</strong></a>, for $200 million,&#8221; along with all the dangers and disruptions to peoples&#8217; lives in your community for the 2 to 4 years it we&#8217;ll take to conduct them. What a deal!</p>
<p>It costs $100 million annually to run the detention facility at Guantanamo, it is highly secure, ready to conduct military commissions for KSM et al, their defense lawyers are ready to defend them, and we&#8217;d protect national security by conducting them in that manner.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a wild idea: Let&#8217;s try them at Gitmo by military commission this year.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gitmo Terrorist Trials: White House Begins Retreat! &#171; Gathering of Eagles: NY</title>
		<link>http://www.911familiesforamerica.org/?p=3061&#038;cpage=1#comment-16178</link>
		<dc:creator>Gitmo Terrorist Trials: White House Begins Retreat! &#171; Gathering of Eagles: NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.911familiesforamerica.org/?p=3061#comment-16178</guid>
		<description>[...] Moving danger? So what if Obama is reconsidering moving 9/11 trials [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Moving danger? So what if Obama is reconsidering moving 9/11 trials [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
